This idea of how we talk with babies -- not just at or around them -- is something I would like to explore more with our teaching team and with all of you. That's why I was glad to stumble across an article online entitled Pretending to Understand What Babies Say Can Make Them Smarter.
The title intrigued me, because I knew it could not be that simple. Spending most of my days with babies, I know, as Dilcia discussed in her post, that there is no "fast track" to, or simple recipe for intelligence. Babies learn when given the chance to direct their own learning, with us caregivers as facilitators and one of the three teachers (parents, educators, and the environment) in a Reggio-inspired approach. I also wondered how genuine my interactions with babies would be if I just "pretended" to understand them. I do think though, we are pretending -- in an intentional way -- to understand our babies' indecipherable utterances. We draw inferences and make connections between their sounds and actions and show them we are listening, until the sounds become syllables, which will eventually become words...phrases...sentences...
I enjoyed the author's funny anecdote and that she admitted that "talking to small children is hard." That's why I think it feels refreshing when I have moments where I really feel as though I am conversing with our babies, just as with other adults.
The short article, which I have attached to this week's e-mail and pasted as a link below, references research published in the journal, Infancy, describing observed interactions between mothers and their infants, eight months or older, in which they coded their responses to the babies' babbling:
"'Redirective' responses involved turning the babies' attention elsewhere...while 'sensitive' responses were ones where the mothers verbally replied to or imitated their sounds." The results (summarized) showed that infants whose mothers used more "sensitive" responses had increased rates of consonant-vowel vocalizations, and also were more likely to direct their sounds toward their mothers, as if "speaking" to them. *
What does this mean for us, the members of our classroom community? I have to point out that I do not believe adults need to wait until babies are eight months -- or any specific age -- to converse with them. I hear parents and teachers doing this with babies of all ages every day. After reviewing all the videos we have taken since mid-January, I found one that really resonated with the connections I have been drawing between my balance-seeking, reading, and day-to-day experiences with teachers, parents, and babies.
This video of Dilcia and Oscar, although amazingly beautiful, is not meant to be instructional. However, I thought we could all use it to reflect on how we communicate with our babies, because we know, despite the absence of words, they have something to say. I am very interested to hear your thoughts about this video, the article, the questions below, and this topic in general!
How would you describe your experience talking with your child?
What impact do you think the ASL we use at school (and at home if you are using it) is having on your baby's language development?
What insight can you give us about communicating with your baby, so we may make connections between language development at school and at home?
With love and care,
Christina (with Amara, Dilcia, and Susie)
*Romm, Cari. Pretending to Understand What Babies Say Can Make Them Smarter. The Atlantic. 8.29.14 http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/08/pretending-to-understand-what-babies-say-can-make-them-smarter/379324/